\nWisdom goddesses are a primary survival of Goddess consciousness within patriarchal systems. In an intact Goddess cosmology, Wisdom is not sharply differentiated from other divine qualities. In that sense the separation is artificial, and typical of the divisions that arise when theologians erect their esoteric hegemonies. But I\u2019m struck by the recurrence of Wisdom deities in the \u201cmajor\u201d religions, and how archaic streams of Goddess reverence continue to flow through them under the doctrinal surfaces. For seekers groping a way back to Origins, it can be illuminating to meditate on divine Wisdom in these forms.<\/span><\/p>\n~ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ~ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ~ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ~ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ~<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Khokhmah and Sophia<\/i><\/b><\/h1>\n
Max Dash\u00fa<\/span><\/p>\n\nThou art a Wisdom. Thou are a Knowing. Thou art Truth.
\nBecause of Thee, there is life. Life is from Thee.
\nBecause of Thee, there is mind.
\n<\/i><\/b><\/span>—The Three Stelas of Seth<\/i>, an Egyptian Gnostic scripture<\/b><\/span><\/h6>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe ancient Hebrew name for Wisdom is Khokhmah, a feminine noun. In Jewish scripture, it was Khokhmah who personified the female Divine. She is understood as an emanation of God, yet she resonates with the Hebrew Goddess who is otherwise assailed in the Bible, especially Asherah, she of the sacred Tree. Proverbs 3:18 calls up an image of Khokhmah that originates in the oldest core of Jewish culture: \u201cShe is a Tree of Life to all who lay hold of her.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nIn the same book, Khokhmah sings, \u201cThe one who finds me, finds life.\u201d Like the goddess Asherah, regarded as the partner of Yahweh by the ancient Hebrews, Khokhmah is linked to the pillar. \u201cMy throne was in the pillar of cloud,\u201d she declares in Ben Sirach (24:4). In Proverbs 9:1 she builds a house of seven pillars.<\/p>\n
Asphodel Long\u2019s book A Chariot Drawn by Lions<\/i> offers profound insights into the survival of the Hebrew Goddess. She points out that Wisdom is another form of the Shekhinah, the divine Presence. Both are \u201cexpressed in light and glory,\u201d both involved in creation, enthroned in heaven, intermediaries between god and the world, ascending and descending, and winged.<\/p>\n
The Book of Wisdom of Solomon<\/i>, written by Alexandrian Jews in the Hellenistic era, renames Khokhmah as Sophia, the Greek word for Wisdom. In this text, as Long points out, Sophia \u201ctakes over the powers and function of God\u201d and the creation story is told using the word \u201cshe.\u201d The ancient author is careful to qualify this audacity by describing Wisdom as God’s breath and emanation, but still praises her at length in her own right as \u201choly\u201d and \u201call-powerful\u201d:<\/p>\n\nFor in her there is a spirit that is intelligent, holy, unique, manifold, subtle;
\n<\/span>mobile, clear, unpolluted, distinct, invulnerable, loving the good, keen, irresistible,
\n<\/span>Beneficent, human, steadfast, sure, free from anxiety, all-powerful,
\n<\/span>overseeing all and penetrating through all spirits that are intelligent and pure and most subtle.
\n<\/span>For wisdom is more mobile than any motion; because of her pureness she pervades and penetrates all things. [Long, 46-7]<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nAnother beautiful passage likens Wisdom to \u201ca flame of stars through the night.\u201d [Allegro, 171] The praise-names in the Book of Wisdom of Solomon resonate deeply with those in the goddess litanies of India. The most celebrated of these is the Sri Lalitaa Sahasranama<\/i>, an invocation of Goddess under a thousand names, including Intelligence, Holy, Unique, Multiformed, Subtle, Pure, Beyond All Danger, Loving the Good, Beneficence, Steady, Without Anxiety, Great Power, and All-Pervasive.<\/span><\/p>\nLong\u2019s illuminating exegesis of the Alexandrian Wisdom litany brings forward the little-known fact that the Greek name monogenes<\/i> (\u201cunique, singly born\u201d) began as a title of female divinities. It originates in a Kemetic title of Neit, Hathor and Isis: \u201cself-born, self-produced,\u201d and later appears in Orphic hymns to Demeter, Persephone and Athena. Christians subsequently applied it to Yeshua of Nazareth who was cast as the \u201conly-begotten son\u201d of god. [Long, 49]<\/p>\n
In late antiquity other titles arose in the Judaic tradition: Shekhinah (Divine Presence) and Matronit (the Mother). Kabbalists redefined Khokhmah as a masculine power, and assigned Binah (Understanding) to the feminine sphere. Torah became to some extent a personification of Wisdom, and Jews in many countries invited Shabbat to enter their homes as the bride of god and the essence of peace and joy.<\/p>\n
There is not room here to enter the Egyptian Stream of Wisdom, but what follows can only be understood in the light of the veneration of Auset, known in Hellenistic culture as Isis. This goddess had come to be worshipped beyond the borders of Egypt, first in west Asia and north Africa, then in Europe. Isis aretalogies (praise-songs based on the affirmation \u201cI am\u201d) emphasize creative Wisdom as one of her divine qualities:<\/p>\n
\n
\nI am Isis, mistress of every land
\n<\/span>I laid down laws for humanity and ordained things that no one may change…
\n<\/span>I divided the earth from the heavens
\n<\/span>I made manifest the paths of the stars
\n<\/span>I prescribed the course of the sun and moon
\n<\/span>I found out the labors of the sea
\n<\/span>I made justice mighty…
\n\u2014Aretalogy of Isis from Cyme, circa 200 CE [Drinker, 114]<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nA syncretic ferment of Egyptian, Greek and Hebrew traditions occurred in Alexandria and the eastern Mediterranean during the Roman empire. Jewish writers appear to have initiated a Greek series of Oracula Sibillina which begin to appear around 150 BCE. Philo Judaeus of Alexandria identified Sophia as Mother of the divine Logos and as Isis, mother of Horus. But Philo followed Biblical tradition in according primacy to the father-god as creator, treating the divine mother\u2014Sophia \u2014 as his attribute or emanation. Nevertheless, he described this god as the husband of Wisdom. [Long, 46, 162; Patai, 98]<\/span><\/p>\nThe pagan priest Plutarch agreed that Isis was the same as Sophia, creator of all. [Allegro, 157] Pagan mystery religions equated Isis with Demeter, Kybele, Juno Caelestis, Bona Dea, Tyche and other Mediterranean goddesses, mixing their attributes and titles. Isis was sculptured wearing the mural crown of the Asian goddess Tyche and holding the cornucopia of the Italian Fortuna and Terra Mater. (These statuettes have been found in distant Kazakhstan and Pakistan.) Multitudes of molded figurines of Isis seated on the basket of the Eleusinian Mysteries were mass-produced for home altars within Egypt itself.<\/p>\n
Most of these Hellenized terracotta statuettes shrink the horned solar crown of the ancient Kemetic goddess and flank it with ears of wheat, assimilating her to Demeter in a historical double rebound. The Knot of Isis that was for millennia tied around her belly moves up to her breast in a tied Grecian shawl. Other terracottas show Isis Baubo with skirts pulled up around her hips and legs opened wide. Still others look to the headwaters of the Nile, as the goddess Besit, linked to the BaTwa peoples, socalled “pygmies,” or perhaps to other little people (\u201cdwarves\u201d).<\/p>\n
In the midst of this syncretism, many Isis terracottas retain the Egyptian convention showing her suckling her son (now represented as a sketchy afterthought). She also appears as Isis Bubastis — Ermouthis to the Greeks — with the lower part of her body in the form of a snake. This form of Isis has turned up as far east as Iraq.<\/p>\n
Some Egyptian Jews engaged in ecstatic forms of worship. Philo wrote that the Therapeutae (\u201chealers\u201d) became \u201ctransported by divine enthusiasm.\u201d They danced and sang hymns in harmonies and antiphonies, women with women and men with men. Then, says Philo, they feasted and drank wine, and at last all joined together in one assembly:<\/p>\n
\n
\nPerfectly beautiful are their motions, perfectly beautiful their discourse; grave and solemn are these carollers; and the final aim of their motions, their discourse, and their choral dances is piety. [Drinker, 159-160]<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nThe Therapeutae were among the Jewish sects in which women \u201cconducted the Sabbath services and provided influential commentaries on the scriptures.\u201d [Long, 38] Philo described their practice as a form of spiritual healing, which in fact gave this community its name:<\/span><\/p>\n\n
\nInasmuch as they profess to the art of healing better than that current in towns, which cures only the bodies, they treat also souls oppressed by grievous and well-nigh intolerable diseases. [Contemplative Life, in Allegro, 109]<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nThe biggest community of Therapeutae lived near the Mareotic lake in northern Egypt. Their huts had little prayer alcoves, and they gathered in a central building for communal meals. Like Philo, they seem to have syncretized Isis with Wisdom and called upon her for healing: \u201cShe was reckoned to cure the sick and to bring the dead to life, and she bore the title ‘Mother of God.’\u201c This was an ancient name of Neit, Isis, and other Kemetic goddesses.
\n<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe Gnostic Goddess<\/i><\/b><\/h1>\n
The syncretism of Judaic, Egyptian, Hellenistic and Persian traditions gave rise to Gnosticism, a name which arose directly from an emphasis on inner knowing. Until the discovery of the Nag Hammadi scrolls, what was known of the Gnostics came mostly from their sworn enemies, the institutional clergy. When church patriarchs selected the books that became the canonical christian bible, they rejected some of the earliest texts, Gnostic scriptures. Among these excluded scriptures were writings that pictured Wisdom as a divine, creative female presence.<\/span><\/p>\nThe Goddess was still well-loved in Egypt, whose ancient religion exerted a tremendous influence on early Gnostic philosophy. The Gospel of Thomas<\/i> retains an invocation from ancient litanies of Auset: \u201cCome, lady revealing hidden secrets…\u201d Aretalogies of Isis made their way into several Gnostic scriptures, as Great Isis continued to be syncretized with Judaic wisdom traditions of Khokhmah under Hellenistic names.<\/p>\n
The Gnostic scripture Eugnostos the Blessed hails \u201cthe all-wise Sophia, Genetrix.\u201d It was she, says the Origin of the World, who \u201ccreated great luminaries and all of the stars and placed them in the heaven so that they should shine upon the earth.\u201d This Gnostic passage echoes the Isis Aretalogy of Cyme: \u201cI divided earth from heaven, I created the ways of the stars…\u201d<\/p>\n
Other Egyptian Gnostic texts name the Divine Female as Ennoia (Thought), Pronoia (Forethought) or Protennoia (Primal Thought), Pistis (Faith), Sige (Silence), Eidea (Image, Idea), or Charis (Grace). These titles are often used interchangeably with Sophia. Several texts address the goddess as Arche (\u201cbeginning\u201d), following the Hebraic representation of Wisdom as Reshiit in the Palestinian Targum and the Samaritan Liturgy. [Arthur, 65, 55, 61; Long, 87ff]<\/p>\n
The early Egyptian Gnostics embraced the Wisdom goddess as a power higher than the god who created the world. A Greek-Coptic text named Origin of the World reworks Genesis to show the Goddess taking part in creation, and restores Eve to her primordial sacred status as the Mother of All Living. In a section known as the \u201cEve intrusion,\u201d Sophia creates \u201cthe Living-Eva, that is, the Instructress of Life.\u201d This androgynous being takes form according to the image of the Mother, and proclaims her identity with her. She assumes titles of Isis, such as \u201cconsoler of the labor pains.\u201d [Arthur, 99, 117, 131]<\/p>\n
This book calls Eve \u201cthe mother of the living,\u201d a title that goes back to the earliest Hebrew roots, and even further, to the Sumerian goddess Ninti. In this telling, it is Eve who gives life to Adam. The archons beheld Eve and compared her to Sophia, \u201cthe likeness which appeared to us in the light.\u201d They plotted to rape and \u201cpollute\u201d Eve, and to cast Adam into a sleep, teaching him that she came into being from his rib \u201cso that the woman will serve and he will rule over her.\u201d But Life\/Eve laughed at their scheming, darkened their eyes and left her likeness beside Adam. \u201cShe entered the tree of knowledge, and remained there. She revealed to them that she had entered the tree and become tree.\u201d The archons ran away in fear, but later came back and defiled Eve’s likeness. \u201cAnd they were deceived, not knowing that they had defiled their own bodies.\u201d [Young, 54; Arthur, 207]<\/p>\n
A Nag Hammadi scroll called the Testimony of Truth<\/i> deifies the wise Serpent who counsels Eve to eat the fruit of knowledge: \u201cOn the day when you eat from the tree which is in the midst of Paradise, the eyes of your mind will be opened.\u201d The scroll’s author points out that god’s threat of immediate death didn’t come true, but the Serpent’s promise of knowledge did. He calls the god of Genesis \u201ca malicious envier\u201d who begrudged humans the power of knowing. This theme of an imperfect creator god recurs in other Gnostic texts. Sophia rebukes this god as a liar and fool when he, unaware of her role in creation, claims sole divinity.<\/p>\n
Another form of the syncretic Egyptian Gnostic goddess is the mysterious Barbelo. Presented as an emanation of god, she resembles Khokhmah. But christian Egyptian texts refer to Mother Barbelo as part of a trinity, along with the Father and Son. The Barbelo literature’s attempts to reconcile conflicting traditions result in contradictions. The Gospel of the Egyptians says that Barbelo originated from herself, as the ancients had said of Neit, Mother of the Gods. But the Three Stelas of Seth present her as \u201cthe first shadow of the holy Father,\u201d who had existed before her. It addresses her with feminine pronouns, but paradoxically praises her as \u201cthe male virginal Barbelo.\u201d[Arthur, 165-6] A later passage reverts to goddess imagery:<\/p>\n
\n
\nThou art a Sophia. Thou art a Gnosis. Thou art truth. Because of thee, there is life. Life is from thee. Because of thee, there is mind… Thou art a cosmos of truth. Thou art a triple power… [Arthur, 166]<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/span><\/em>The Sethian Gnostics said that this trinity was made up of Light, Breath, and Darkness. The Peratae had it as Father, Son and Matter, with the Son mediating between the exalted Father and a passive female principle. [<\/span>Philosophumena, in Doresse, 52, 50]<\/span><\/p>\nHowever, the Trimorphic Protennoia exalts \u201cBarbelo, the perfect glory,\u201d from whose thought originated the trinity of Father, Mother, Son. This scroll contains an aretalogy that unambiguously praises the goddess Protennoia as the origin: \u201cI am Primal Thought that dwells in the Light… she who exists before the All… I move in every creature… I am the Invisible One within the All.\u201d[Pagels, 55; Long, 92-3] Her divinity is immeasurable, ineffable and radiant. [Arthur, 168]<\/span><\/p>\nThe Apochryphon of John<\/i> contains another aretalogy of \u201cthe perfect Pronoia (forethought) of the universe,\u201d who was \u201cthe first.\u201d She wandered in the great darkness, \u201cinto the midst of the prison,\u201d even into the depths of the underworld. She represents \u201cthe light which exists in light.\u201d But this christian text compared \u201csister Sophia\u201d unfavorably to Barbelo. A splintering of Gnostic goddess images was underway. They were being subordinated to \u201cthe Father,\u201d and those not firmly partnered to a male god disparaged. The derivative Gnostic aretalogies reflect an emerging concept of the \u201cfallen\u201d goddess.<\/p>\n
The longest Gnostic aretalogy appears in Thunder, Perfect Mind<\/i> (originally titled The Divine Barbelo<\/i>). It follows the form of the old Isis litanies: \u201cI am the wisdom of the Greeks \/ And the knowledge of the barbarians \/ I am one whose image is great in Egypt…\u201d Unlike the aretalogies, however, Thunder is marked by dualism, pairing negatives\u2014\u201cignorance… shame… fear\u201d\u2014with Barbelo’s divine qualities. [Arthur, 164, 175] Still, it contains verse of remarkable beauty and profundity:<\/p>\n\nI am the first and the last
\n<\/span>I am the honored one and the scorned one
\n<\/span>I am the whore and the holy one
\n<\/span>I am the wife and the virgin
\n<\/span>I am the mother and the daughter
\n<\/span>I am the members of my mother
\n<\/span>I am the barren one, and many are her sons….
\n<\/span>I am the silence that is incomprehensible
\n<\/span>And the idea whose remembrance is frequent
\n<\/span>And the word whose appearance is multiple
\n<\/span>I am the utterance of my name.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThough Sophia is prominent in the Gnostic creation accounts, she was being stripped of the radiant holiness the Egyptians attributed to Isis and the Hebrews to Khokhmah. In her ground-breaking and all-too-little-known study The Wisdom Goddess<\/i>, Rose Arthur shows how the positive view of Sophia in the early, pre-Christian scriptures was gradually broken down and degraded by a masculinizing, Christianizing movement that emphasized a \u201cfallen Sophia.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nArthur demonstrates that the older texts were consistently re-edited to reduce and subordinate female divinity, while exalting the male god. The Hypostasis of the Archons<\/i> is no more than \u201ca Christianized, patriarchalized and defeminized summary of On the Origin of the World<\/i>.\u201d It blatantly substitutes the christian god for the Gnostic goddess. For example, the line \u201cBut all this came to pass according to the Pronoia of Pistis\u201d becomes \u201cBut all these things came to pass in the Will of the Father of the All.\u201d<\/p>\n
The pre-Christian scripture Eugnostos the Blessed<\/i> was revamped as the Sophia Jesu Christi<\/i>, in which Sophia rebels against the \u201cFather of the Universe,\u201d repents of her fault, and is saved by her male partner, Jesus Christ. The revisionist text repeatedly refers to the \u201cfault of the woman.\u201d The same process was at work in the Pistis Sophia<\/i>, where the fallen Sophia is made to sing thirteen hymns of repentence before Jesus helps her to regain the spiritual heights.<\/p>\n
These new patriarchal discourses still had to contend with a deep-rooted conviction in the Goddess as the ultimate source of life. Even hostile writers acknowledge that Sophia gives the breath of life to Adam, though they show this happening indirectly. But they view the material creation as evil, imprisoning the souls who live in it. Often Sophia herself is shown falling into bondage.<\/p>\n
In one Gnostic myth, Sophia was made prisoner by the seven archons. The essence of Wisdom made flesh in female form was subjected to every indignity, including being forced into whoredom. In one version, Simon Magus rescues \u201cHelena\u201d from a brothel in Tyre. But in actuality she is the creator of the angels who made the world. She is called Kyria, Lady, a Greek term corresponding to the christian god’s title Kyrios. [Allegro, 141-5] These stories don\u2019t refer to idealized notions of sacred harlots making love in freedom, but to female degradation in the prison-brothels of the Roman empire. While they may be taken as an affirmation of the presence of the sacred within the enslaved women, they also demark a clear demotion of the Wisdom goddess, who has lost her original sovereign power.<\/p>\n
The earlier view of Goddess as the supreme Source, or alternatively as a male god’s perfect partner, now gave way to the idea that she was a lower being in need of pardon and salvation. New authors developed themes of a deluded and foolish Sophia (contradicting the very meaning of her name, \u201cWisdom\u201d). They accuse of her of breaking cosmic law by creating without a male partner and describe her creation as defective. [Couliano, 78-9]<\/p>\n
While these writers blamed Sophia for conceiving alone, they praise the male god for creating without a partner. In their tellings, Sophia he is cast down and made to suffer and repent until a superior male god deigns to \u201ccorrect her deficiency.\u201d As Sophia is mythically overthrown, other female figures pick up aspects of her power, but the force of the Gnostic Wisdom goddess is almost spent.<\/p>\n
Under the oppressive climate of the Roman empire, with its heavy taxation, displaced populations, urban crowding, plagues, slave economy, and arena executions, to say nothing of pervasive violence against women, a profound negativity had seeped into religious consciousness. People felt like prisoners in the world, and a conviction arose that creation itself was flawed. The taint reached back to the Goddess herself, since she manifested herself in matter, in birth, in bodies.<\/p>\n
This new doctrine identifying the female with bondage, weakness, inferiority and fault was the final means of overthrowing the Goddess Mysteries in the Mediterranean. The process was erratic. Judaic Wisdom mysticism, so influential in early Gnosticism, exalted the creative power of Khokhmah, and held that creation was good, even though the female is formally subordinated to the male throughout the Bible. But increasingly Gnostics gravitated toward an \u201cvalue-inversion,\u201d not only revolting against the Biblical god, but rejecting all creation as well.<\/p>\n
Although Gnostics were strongly influenced by Judaism, which features Wisdom as a co-creator, many of their writings evince a strong animus against it. Some emphasize the female creative principle, while others, especially the later texts, demote her. Much of Gnostic scripture reinterprets the biblical creation story, making Yahweh (cast as Ialdabaoth or Saklas or Authades) junior to the creating Wisdom goddess, unaware of her presence but working with her light. Possibly this theme originated as a re-assertation of the Goddess (especially she of ten-thousand-names in Egypt) whose scattered signatures are visible in the Gnostic amalgam of Hellenistic, Judaic and Persian cosmologies. Some of these accounts can be read as a defense of her divinity and creative power as against the increasingly influential concept of a masculine god as sole creator.<\/p>\n
But the syncretic Goddess of late antiquity was gradually subjected to heavy-handed reinterpretation as Gnostics embraced a heavily polarized doctrine of dualism. Their rejection of the \u201clower\u201d world ended up dragging down the Goddess in the midst of its attack on Judaism. It demanded rejection of the body, of lovemaking and the ancient birth mysteries: of Earth and Nature herself. New christian doctrines stripped Sophia of her divine qualities, dramatically subordinating her to the Father and to Christ as her male partner and savior. Later writers dropped the name Sophia altogether. Some introduce new names, but the visible trend is away from myths exalting a creatrix.<\/span><\/p>\nThe variant picture of the Gnostic scriptures reflects an intense campaign to beat down goddess veneration and to split body and spirit. The tension is more open in the Gnostic gospels precisely because the female divinity is still powerful, in contrast to the Christian canon. It was in Egypt and other centers of the Mysteries that the last stand for open Goddess worship was fought — and ultimately lost — on the battleground of Gnosticism.<\/p>\n
Eradicating the Goddess proved to be an impossible task. She survived in myriads of forms in popular belief, veiled as Mary or Christian saints. The Virgin Mary occupied a much less powerful position in church doctrine and scriptures than the old pagan Goddess. Folk tradition is another story; their devotion shifted to Mary from the old goddesses and persisted over centuries as new ethnicities entered Christendom. Due to this popular pressure and the role it played in the clergy’s conversion strategy, Mary escaped the degradation that Gnostic christians ended up heaping on Sophia, and the stigma that theologians cast over Eve. Catholicism ended up absorbing goddess traditions over the centuries, through progressive engorgements, while Gnosticism gradually shed them.<\/p>\n
But the story of Sophia does not end there. Her Greek worshippers succeeded in assimilating her to Orthodox Christianity, as Hagia Sophia. The greatest cathedral of the Byzantines was raised in honor of this \u201cHoly Wisdom,\u201d supported by the great porphyry pillars taken from the Ephesian temple of Artemis. The early Orthodox Greeks regarded Hagia Sophia as a female member of the Trinity, the “Holy Spirit.\u201d This strand persisted in Orthodox Christian mysticism, and is still a force in Russian spirituality. Western Christian feminists have also reclaimed it in recent decades.<\/p>\n
This title of \u201cHoly Spirit\u201d also belonged to Ruha d\u2019Qudsha, the goddess of the Iraqi Mandaeans. She had been demonized by the Christian era, but she is an Aramaean analogue to the Hebrew Shekhinah: compare Biblical ruach<\/i>, \u201cspirit\u201d and qadoshah<\/i>, \u201choly,\u201d and remember, too, the ancient Canaanite-Egyptian goddess QDSU or Qudsha. The Aramaean goddess undergoes the same debasement in Syria and northern Iraq as Sophia had in the eastern Mediterranean. Ruha d\u2019Qudsha, as mother of the \u201cevil\u201d planets and zodiac spirits, is another fallen, or rather toppled, goddess. She is called deficient and defective, and must be uplifted and guided by the Father.<\/p>\n
The Torah uses the word \u201chovering,\u201d as with beating wings, to describe the divine Presence that Talmudic writers had begun to call the Shekhinah. Her image resonates with the ancient veneration of doves as sacred to Canaanite, Syrian, and Cypriot goddesses. Christians adopted this imagery, picturing the Holy Spirit as a winged radiance and a hovering dove. She flutters above Mary in innumerable scenes of the Annunciation, and above the consecrated chalice and bread.<\/p>\n
As for Khokhmah, she remained a presence within the Hebrew Scriptures. Thousands of years after her praises were embedded in the Book of Proverbs, medieval Christian mystics were attracted to this female image of Wisdom. Hildegarde of Bingen knew her as Sophia, Scientia Dei, and Sapientia of the seven pillars. One of her manuscripts even shows her wearing the mural crown of the ancient goddess of Asia Minor. Hildegarde\u2019s profoundly animistic poetry sings the praises of Life endowed with Wisdom, as a goddess in all but name:<\/p>\n
\n
\nI am that supreme and fiery force that sends forth all living sparks. Death hath no part in me, yet I bestow death, wherefore I am girt about with Wisdom as with wings. I am that living and fiery essence of the divine substance that glows in the beauty of the fields, and in the shining water, and in the burning sun and the moon and the stars, and in the force of the invisible wind, the breath of all living things, I breathe in the green grass and the flowers, and in the living waters…
\n<\/i><\/span>[<\/i>Book of Divine Works, circa 1167, in Partnow,<\/em> The Quotable Woman<\/i>, 48]<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nCopyright 2000 Max Dashu.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"Holy_Wisdom_(16th_c.,_Vologda_museum)\"](\"https:\/\/cosmicconvergence.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Holy_Wisdom_16th_c._Vologda_museum.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n