{"id":30140,"date":"2019-01-15T15:31:02","date_gmt":"2019-01-15T19:31:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cosmicconvergence.org\/?p=30140"},"modified":"2019-01-15T15:31:02","modified_gmt":"2019-01-15T19:31:02","slug":"5g-jamming-our-bio-circuitry-and-natural-connection-with-the-earth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cosmicconvergence.org\/?p=30140","title":{"rendered":"5G Jamming Our Bio-Circuitry and Natural Connection with the Earth"},"content":{"rendered":"

Groundbreaking Interview: wireless technology is de-tuning man\u2019s brain
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n

From Doreen<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nick Pineault\u00a0<\/strong>is optimistic we can create safe technology once we\u00a0acknowledge current technology is unsafe,<\/em>\u00a0and start asking knowledgeable, responsible engineers, biologists, and critical thinkers to create wireless communications that are biologically compatible with man and nature. This is what the following\u00a0groundbreaking interview<\/strong>\u00a0is about.<\/p>\n

I edited an hour of the video transcript and inserted resources*<\/strong>\u00a0because\u00a0people deserve to know<\/strong>\u00a0and understand how wireless technology is\u00a0de-tuning their brain and altering man\u2019s original blueprint,<\/strong>\u00a0like in the days of Noah [See Part II].<\/p>\n

\n

Nick Pineault\u00a0<\/a>
\nAug 16, 2018<\/span><\/p>\n

Host\u00a0Nicola Pineault<\/strong>\u00a0is an investigative health journalist specializing in electromagnetic fields [EMFs]. Nick wrote \u2018The Non Tinfoil Guide to EMFs\u2019\u00a0\u00a0http:\/\/nontinfoilemf.com<\/a>\u00a0and hosts an ElectrosmogRX course for health practitioners to learn about EMFs.\u00a0http:\/\/electrosmogRX.com<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Electrical engineer and EMF expert\u00a0Pawel Wypychowski<\/strong>\u00a0from Poland, describes how wireless signal\u2019s frequency, pulsing, modulation and other characteristics all contribute to \u201cjamming\u201d the body\u2019s connection with Earth\u2019s natural EMFs. A mind-boggling discussion that opens doors to solutions that include bio-compatible wireless signals.<\/p>\n

During the first 16 minutes Pawel talks about the debilitating impact of wireless on his health, and no known medical assistance. He goes on to explain the science of electromagnetic fields and impact of wireless on man\u2019s brain.<\/p>\n

Transcript highlights<\/p>\n

15:49 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0You shared with me a PDF about different kinds of natural EMFs the body requires. Can we discuss that because some viewers may be unaware, and look at different frequencies natural to planet Earth that if you remove these frequencies you create disease, which is scientifically established. Can you comment on that?<\/p>\n

16:26 PW<\/strong>: We have very broad evidence of that basic fact of evolution. As a species we evolved under natural EMFs including light. People consider light as something different than EMF however\u00a0light is EMF<\/strong>, and those natural fields are, except light, which is quite strong, they are very tiny but very important. To mention a few of them, first we have the\u00a0magnetic field of the Earth<\/strong>, which is quite strong. It\u2019s a magnetostatic field so it\u2019s static but this field is crucial for the life of Earth because it\u2019s actually protecting us from the solar winds from the from the Sun, without which life would never have happened on Earth, and this interaction, which is solar wind from one side, and the magnetic field here, causes this magnetic field to deform.<\/p>\n

17:52 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0It is quite an important thing that the magnetic field on the day side of the Earth facing the Sun, is different spatially than the magnetic field on the other side, and\u00a0our body senses that<\/strong>. This is one of the mechanisms of doing a distinction between night and day. It\u2019s part of the circadian rhythm and it\u2019s not only light. It\u2019s light, and also this on\/off scenario where you have this magnetic flux change but its spatial configuration is different. Our bodies also sense that. This is one, this is just a magnetostatic field but we have to consider that in proper context because it\u2019s ever changing, and it\u2019s changing in a way how the Earth turns around the Sun. It was this way for a billion years so we are connected to that, and we need it to drive the processes, the organs in our body. This is the one thing.<\/p>\n

19:21 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0The second thing is the\u00a0Schumann Resonance<\/strong>, a low frequency electromagnetic field caused by thunderstorms around the world, and the cavity between the surface of the earth and the ionosphere. This electromagnetic field is\u00a0\u00a0crucial for our circadian rhythm regulation\u00a0<\/strong>and all other processes. So I think it\u2019s enough to say that this main frequency, which is\u00a07.83 Hertz, is the main frequency of the human brain, so we tune to it<\/strong>\u00a0as do all creatures with advanced nervous systems. We are talking about humans, the animals we eat, and all life around us. There are a lot of studies about what happens to us when we are disconnected from the Schumann Resonance field. Part of it from NASA, and from Russian\u00a0astronauts in orbit\u00a0<\/strong>without the Schumann Resonance because they are above the ionosphere so they do not have any connection to this field. It turns out that slowly but surely\u00a0organs degenerate.<\/strong>\u00a0The first signs are psychological but also vision degeneration, and in the long run osteoporosis, so losing the bone, and disconnection from the Schumann Resonance is really more important than being without gravity for body processes.<\/p>\n

*<\/strong>A\u00a0circadian rhythm<\/strong>\u00a0is a roughly 24 hour cycle in the physiological processes of living beings, including plants, animals, fungi and cyanobacteria.\u00a0https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/terms\/circadian_rhythm.htm<\/a><\/p>\n

21:38 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0This is quite crucial, and what is very important for the discussion about wireless communication is the basic pulsing of digital signals that are pulsed in a certain way. For example\u00a0Wi-Fi is pulsed with the frequency of 10 Hertz<\/strong>\u00a0so it basically means you have 7.83 Hertz [natural to man\u2019s brain] and 10 Hertz in your body which is artificial and many times, actually\u00a0even a million times stronger than the Schumann Resonance field<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

22:26 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0Just so I understand. Let\u2019s say\u00a0Wi-Fi is at 2.4 gigahertz, which is 2.4 billion Hertz.\u00a0<\/strong>This is the frequency, the carrier wave. This is the wave and then you add information on the wave. I imagine this like a train, and then you put information packets in there and at the same time the train\u00a0appears and disappears 10 times a second, so a pulsing of 10 Hertz<\/strong>. Is that the case?<\/p>\n

22:54 PW: Yes. If you want to transfer any information on the wave, which is 2.4 gigahertz for that example, you have to modulate this.\u00a0To modulate becomes very complex<\/strong>. In electronics engineering there is a very complex scheme for modulation because we are trying to put as much data onto this as possible because we are now all using Smartphones, and we want to see full HD movies on the Smartphone, so we need more and more of these. Clients need more and more data to output through the wireless devices. So these are very complicated schemes and the basic thing is that if you have the transmitter and receiver,\u00a0before they can transmit any data<\/strong>they need to synchronize time between them<\/strong>. To do this you have to you transmit the clock signal. Let\u2019s say it\u2019s called a frame signal, which means in between you put the data but you have to\u00a0transmit the clock signal to synchronize<\/strong>\u00a0the receiver with transmitter so the receiver can recognize and decode the signal.<\/p>\n

24:39 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0Actually, it\u2019s for unknown reasons but\u00a0I can give some explanation<\/strong>\u00a0so that those clock signals for example in Wi-Fi were chosen at 10 Hertz.<\/p>\n

NP:<\/strong>\u00a0So ten times a second you have nothing.<\/p>\n

PW:<\/strong>\u00a0You have\u00a02.4 gigahertz signal but it\u2019s pulsed in a frequency of 10 Hertz<\/strong>, and the other fact, which is very important, is that from many studies we established that\u00a0we have a lot of semiconduction in our body<\/strong>. This is very well-known from the study of bio electronics, and also from Robert Becker\u2019s book \u2018Body Electric\u2019. So we have nonlinear junction, nonlinear electronic elements in our body. If you put the modulated 2.4 gigahertz wave on the nonlinear element, this is a basic fact of electronics, then on this element the signal is demodulated.\u00a0What our body gets is a demodulated signal of 10 Hertz.<\/strong><\/p>\n

*<\/strong>Robert Becker\u2019s book\u00a0http:\/\/www.emfresearch.com\/the-body-electric\/<\/a><\/p>\n

25:56 NP:\u00a0<\/strong>So the body interprets the 2.4 gigahertz as 10 Hertz and then\u00a0the brain is out of\u00a0tune.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0It should be around 7.83 Hertz, and this I think is rich in alpha waves.<\/p>\n

PW:<\/strong>\u00a0Yes. Another fact that is also very well known in electronics is that if you have one generator, which is the Schumann Resonance in the environment, very weak one, and the other one with closed frequency, which is much more powerful like the demodulated 10 Hertz signal from wireless devices, what happens is\u00a0frequency pulling<\/strong>\u00a0as it is called in electronics. This means the weaker generator is actually changing its frequency towards the stronger one. So what is going on actually,\u00a0your alpha waves are not natural alpha waves anymore, they are pulled to the 10 Hertz frequency<\/strong>. In other words,\u00a0you are de-tuned<\/strong>; you are de-tuning your brain constantly. This is the one fact.<\/p>\n

27:11 PW<\/strong>: The other fact of electronics is that if you put two frequencies close to each other, not necessarily close, but two frequencies on the nonlinear element, they are mixed. This is called\u00a0mixing of frequencies,<\/strong>\u00a0and the product of mixing is not only the one frequency and the other frequency but also\u00a0the sum of the frequencies<\/strong>\u00a0and the difference between the frequencies<\/strong>. So now your brain has instead of one natural Schumann Resonance frequency, your brain has four frequencies very close to each other, and all of those frequencies are in the bandwidth of our brain actually because they are all in the bandwidth of the Schumann Resonance wave because the Schumann Resonance is not only 7.83 Hertz, there are also different smaller signals. So actually the bandwidth is between 4 Hertz and 60 Hertz. All those byproducts mixing between those two frequencies are in this range. Now, you have at least three new frequencies introduced for the brain which are completely artificial and the question is \u201cTo what frequency to tune to<\/strong>?\u201d<\/p>\n

NP:<\/strong>\u00a0Yes, and what are the consequences of re-tuning too?<\/p>\n

28:30 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0We do not really know for now if this, or the switch between the frequency, or frequency pulling, or frequency mixing, how they actually affect different functions of the body but\u00a0we can be very sure<\/strong>\u00a0that they are sensed by the body<\/strong>, and these are the basic facts of electronics, so it\u2019s not a matter of proving it,\u00a0you have to disprove<\/strong>\u00a0basic\u00a0<\/strong>facts of electronics\u00a0<\/strong>to say this is not existent because it has to happen.<\/p>\n

PW: 29:06<\/strong>\u00a0Basically, the physics of electromagnetic fields and electronics are factual. So in our environment we are now changing this tuning to natural fields, and what I am saying in my presentations, I give also the analogy to\u00a0neurological jamming of the signal<\/strong>. If you want an example, in warfare it\u2019s widely used to jam the signal of your enemy. To break the communication of the enemy you use jammers. These are special radio devices, which put frequencies that are very, very close to the frequency you want to jam and a lot higher. The receiver on the site of the enemy cannot recognize the real signal.<\/p>\n

PW 30:12<\/strong>\u00a0This is actually what is going on now. We have so many artificial signals that our brain has really very slight chance to tune to this basic Schumann Resonance frequency. So it\u2019s like\u00a0we are disconnected from this tuning frequency of the Earth more and more<\/strong>. We are not only disconnected but we also introduced to the environment the frequencies that are strange for the brain, new in the environment, not existent in the evolutionary history. We now have evidence from a lot of researchers, for example with astronauts that\u00a0our body is actually trying somehow, is in the process of\u00a0<\/strong>evolution trying to somehow deal with that and make some changes to adopt<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

31:10 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0This up regulates the gene expression, and trying to find new solutions but it\u2019s an evolution so the solution may be in this, and that particular example may be found but maybe not. Maybe the organism just dies, or just be severely deregulated<\/strong>. We never know and we have just started that in terms of evolution on Earth let\u2019s say 30 years of wireless signals. It\u2019s really very, very short period for evolution to work. So now we are I think experiencing more of the deregulation and degeneration caused by that, and very different ones because of evolution trying to find a solution, something, and we are constantly deregulated and that is really scary if you see this in details.<\/p>\n

NP:\u00a0<\/strong>It is, and this is a great explanation Pavel. Maybe this is\u00a0why people feel better in a low EMF environment or in nature\u00a0<\/strong>because their body is finally able to tune. It\u2019s fascinating.
\n
\n32:38 PW:\u00a0<\/strong>Exactly. There is a problem now of discussing about the EMF is good or bad or even you have this is the argument of the other side very often heard that no you have the EMF devices, which are used for example in medicine, for regeneration or something but\u00a0they miss the basic fact<\/strong>\u00a0that if you want to stimulate EMFst that might be a good thing but then\u00a0you have to provide the environment for regeneration<\/strong>. Difference between\u00a0 short term exposure and long term exposure is quite a huge one. It\u2019s not like you can for example use some short wave stimulation for your knee or something. It\u2019s causing the knee to re-grow that\u2019s a fact. It\u2019s used in medicine but then you are supposed to go home, lay and relax, and your body regenerates. It\u2019s the basic fact that you need a stimulus, and then you need the phase of relaxation and re-growth. Like weightlifting okay, you give a big stimulus to your muscles, you even over stimulate them but then you have to provide the time without the stimulus to regenerate,\u00a0and now we are in constant electromagnetic radiation there is no regeneration phase<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

34:22 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0We are constantly under it so it\u2019s like\u00a0trying to treat post-traumatic stress\u00a0<\/strong>disorder on the battlefield.<\/strong>\u00a0You cannot.\u00a0You have to remove the stress<\/strong>. Just providing an environment to relax and to do something, and this is actually what are people doing when they go to nature and are reconnected with those fields. They start to feel to feel better but\u00a0now the time of this regeneration is very limited.
\n<\/strong>
\n35:11 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0Here in this point. What I am doing and\u00a0what I propose to all<\/strong>, especially people experiencing chronic diseases, to\u00a0at least<\/strong>shield the bedroom<\/strong>\u00a0or perhaps the whole house but\u00a0shield your bedroom for eight hours of sleep<\/strong>\u00a0to provide the environment without those artificial signals. Usually with time it helps a lot, and actually some other forms of therapies start to work that didn\u2019t work before because if you are deregulated you cannot, if you are detuned, even your healing mechanism in your body starts to work differently or not work efficiently. So the time of regeneration, and I\u2019m not only talking about unhealthy or diseased people.<\/strong><\/p>\n

36:17 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0If you want your best performance mentally and physically, if you are for example an invalid you can shorten very much the time of regeneration if you introduce such kind of shielding for your bedroom, and you can then really rest and relax being connected to the natural field, and undisturbed by the artificial fields.<\/p>\n

36:47 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0This is a great point. I think even in discussions I have sometimes we\u2019re so focused on the details, like oh it\u2019s melatonin, it\u2019s the lymphatic system, and this and that.\u00a0Overall<\/strong>\u00a0we are electrical, there\u2019s signal jamming in the environment, when you remove the signal jamming it turns out that your brain works better<\/strong>. If the brain works better every gland in your body works better, cellular regeneration works better, mitochondria, everything works better, and healing works better. It\u2019s common-sense here in this discussion but\u00a0you have to acknowledge that the body is electrical<\/strong>. It\u2019s still a fairly new idea in medicine, and in mainstream. People are surprised and it\u2019s something I shared in my book,\u00a0your brain has enough electricity to charge an iPhone in something like 68 hours.<\/strong>\u00a0So people, yes, the brain is electrical, your heart is electrical, your nervous system has many electrical components. Some of them are EMF, some are light, some electricity, magnetism, there\u2019s are multiple things discovered. Even bacteria to bacteria and fungi to fungi communication uses some sort of light and photons emission hat now can be detected.<\/p>\n

*<\/strong>We\u2019ve always been taught that the brain is where the action is. The brain has an electrical field that does have a magnetic field but they\u2019re relatively weak compared to the heart. The heart is about 100 times stronger electrically, and up to 5,000 times stronger magnetically than the brain.\u00a0https:\/\/youtu.be\/X1SMqQH7FJU<\/a><\/p>\n

38:10 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0Even the heart produces a magnetic field that\u2019s detectable up to several feet. I appreciate this high level conversation instead of getting into details. It helps me better understand what is happening.\u00a0We\u2019re filled with jamming<\/strong>\u00a0so let\u2019s talk about this jamming a little more in precision because there are different characteristics of the signal that is comprised in a cell phone, or Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth that contribute to it being a better jammer or way more disruptive.<\/p>\n

In science there\u2019s one article I\u2019m glad was studied by I think Pantego Poulos that does many great things. She says that\u00a0signal generators<\/strong>\u00a0used in studies for example that exposed rats to 2.4 gigahertz signal for 15 hours, and then they look at the rats or kill them to look at the organ damage. They used signal generators,\u00a0machines that are supposed to emulate<\/strong>\u00a0a cell phone, or emulate a Wi-Fi. The researchers did many studies, dozens if not hundreds, and compared the effects using a signal generator to the effects when using a real cell phone or real Wi-Fi and every time or most of the time\u00a0the Wi-Fi and the cell phones caused more harm<\/strong>\u00a0than what we think should be the equivalent. The reason behind that is probably how the technology is built, this modulation, and everything that isn\u2019t initially present in a signal generators. Does that make sense<\/p>\n

40:05 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0Yes that makes sense. The problem is that most of the studies are done by biochemists, medical doctors who usually do not understand radio communication correctly. They see for example the carrier wave is 2.4 gigahertz. Then they build a simple 2.4 gigahertz generator into the study, and they study organ responses however\u00a0these are not those signals we are now experiencing in the environment<\/strong>. The signal from the mobile base station or Wi-Fi router is much more complex, and it\u2019s modulated on several layers. First thing is the\u00a0clock signal<\/strong>\u00a0I talked about earlier but it\u2019s only a starting point because those signals are from many mobile devices. They have to compete for the carrier frequency to communicate because they cannot communicate all in the same time.<\/p>\n

So you have\u00a0time slots<\/strong>\u00a0for them, you have\u00a0different schemes<\/strong>\u00a0for communication and managing that. This is called the\u00a0level of career access,<\/strong>\u00a0and there many techniques that change the signal action, and modulate that with other frequencies. After that you put the data, the real data which you want to transmit on top of that, and now that\u2019s the data, now you have the signal which really depends on what you are transmitting. The signal would be different if you are transmitting movie or you are talking. That\u2019s the other thing.<\/p>\n

42:09 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0Now with 5G,<\/strong>\u00a0and some of the Wi-Fi technology in recent years, you have spatial beam modulation. The way it\u2019s modulated spatially, polarized in different ways and modulated spatially by applying the technique which is called MIMO or spatial MIMO [Multiple Input Multiple Output], and it\u2019s spatial is structured in a way that can be decoded on the other side of the receiver but\u00a0it\u2019s changing also how your body is exposed.<\/strong><\/p>\n

42:49 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0So we have at least four layers of modulating or changing signals, which our body is experiencing and because we had a lot of scientific studies done starting with Dr. Andrew Moreno, he was working with Dr. Trevor Becker, and he proved around 1990 or maybe around 2000 that we sense that,\u00a0our brain senses those signals.\u00a0<\/strong>So he registered changes in the pattern of brain waves even with very tiny signals with EMF, and the response is actually different for different types of those signals. The\u00a0studies that are done with simply carrier waves say nothing about what is really going on<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

I put that into the slides I sent you.\u00a0I suggest people at least skip through this document<\/strong>done by the European Academy of Environmental Medicine. It\u2019s Called European 2016, published on PubMed so it\u2019s widely available.<\/p>\n

44:22 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0Based on the analysis of different studies on EMF done over 30 to 40 years, they established so called\u00a0biological limits<\/strong>, and if you look at the table for biological limits for the wireless signals, you see that for the basic radio signal with frequency modulation, this is the signal of the radio you can hear in your car, the limit for that is actually a thousand times higher than for Wi-Fi signal simply because of that.<\/p>\n

For the radio signal this is simply a carrier wave. It\u2019s modulated but this modulation is very simple, and then you have the very advanced modulation Wi-Fi. So the thing along which is the difference in modulation, causes the biological limit being ten thousand lower or thousands of times lower.\u00a0With the 5G<\/strong>\u00a0we should expect the difference to be ten or 100 times because of those additional spatial modulation and other things. We are now with the signals, which can be very tiny but which have I used the term\u00a0the tune or the regulation<\/strong>\u00a0potential, which is very high for the human brain, for the human nervous system.<\/p>\n

46:16 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0So let me summarize this because this is a lot to unpack for people and some people may be lost a little bit but if I\u00a0summarize what\u2019s happening<\/strong>\u00a0we talked about the fact that our bodies are tuned to the different kinds of natural EMFs in nature. So the magnetosphere that is a static magnetic field that is fairly strong, we\u2019re connected to that, the Schumann Resonance, light and other things in our environment tune our body to the environment, and the body works okay without illness or let\u2019s say it works optimally.\u00a0The electrical system is tuned<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

46:59 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0When you have many different signals that is the electrosmog that we each live in. I\u2019m being exposed right now. Pavel I hope you\u2019re not being too much exposed.You\u2019re probably in the countryside but still even in the countryside you would get some radio, you would get some TV.<\/p>\n

PW:<\/strong>\u00a0I have my house shielded!
\n<\/strong>
\nNP:<\/strong>\u00a0Well that\u2019s good, so you have it shielded to not have this signal jamming that jams your dashboard, your internal dashboard that\u2019s trying to tune your brain, your nervous system, everything is trying to tune,\u00a0but it\u2019s trying to tune to the wrong signal\u00a0<\/strong>because of these things you mentioned as far as electronic engineering rules, and then you have new technologies that don\u2019t initially have a higher power, and this is the thing that a lot of people will argue well a cell phone. 5g for example will require less power because it\u2019s a shorter distance, and they play around with \u201cOh it\u2019s less power don\u2019t worry about it\u201d, well it\u2019s not actually power. Power is one type of thing that can impact how jamming the effect is of a certain signal.<\/p>\n

48:06 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0Let\u2019s say I just make up numbers here. Your cell phone right now emits 100 units of radiation. Maybe 5G will emit 50 units and the industry will say \u201cWell it\u2019s 2 times as good, right?\u201d The radiation went down but then the 50 units of radiation can have a potential of 10,000 times the effect as far as\u00a0how jamming this signal is to human biology<\/strong>\u00a0but no one is studying exactly how<\/strong>, so the industry can get away with it.<\/p>\n

Even studies that are published will not necessarily look at these different characteristics, and\u00a0in the show notes for this episode<\/strong>, in the description, you\u2019ll find the studies I mentioned. So the fact that\u00a0polarization of the signal changes the biological effect<\/strong>, and there\u2019s an amazing paper in 2015 published that I have a hard time understanding to be quite honest, but it shows that there\u2019s information that we have here and there that shows that a certain signal at the equal strength of signal, one signal can be extremely jamming and the other one not as much. Can you talk about\u00a0polarization<\/strong>? Is it the shape of the signal?<\/p>\n

49:22 PW:\u00a0<\/strong>You can say it\u2019s the shape of the signal in the 3D space environment. It\u2019s the shape of the signal in the space, and it\u2019s actually connected with any antenna, meaning also the human body, how the human body responds to that because with different kinds of polarization you can get different types of effects. Even the strength of the signal is actually differently received depending on the polarization of the signal. If the polarization of the signal is vertical, and the antenna is horizontal, then you will not get a lot of the signal. \u00a0When you polarize the antenna to the field then you have the strongest signal and\u00a0we do not know how those antennae in the human body are polarized to those signals<\/strong>, but even if we did know it doesn\u2019t help because those signals are not spatially modulated and it\u2019s ever changing modulation. So we react to that and that we know for sure but we don\u2019t know how we react to that actually, and even if we know it\u2019s ever changing, and this schemes of modulation, of spatial modulation they are built by electronic engineers for efficiency of transmitting data. They do not study at all about the biological effects. They do not know anything about it, and it\u2019s not because they are bad people, they are engineers who are paid to build the most efficient technology of transmitting data in our environment, and they do not care really about the biological effects of those signals, and those signals, and those schemes are becoming more and more complex. To even understand them \u00a0requires now higher mathematics and skills in that.<\/p>\n

51:42 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0I understand that but it\u2019s very difficult for the average person to even go through. It\u2019s really very, very, advanced technology for now, to transmit but there are a lot of things which are now unknown like how the organ will react to that. We have from those studies we\u00a0have some hints that it\u2019s probably huge<\/strong>\u00a0but we don\u2019t do very much about it. The studies are not in that direction there are just a few studies if I am tracking them correctly, which are showing for example differences between the 3G and 4G modulations. The effects on the rats were much stronger with 4G than with 3G with the same intensity level. I\u2019m saying this is simply because this modulation scheme is different.<\/p>\n

52:53 NP:<\/strong>\u00a0Keep in mind people listening to this. Look in the comments or the description for the NTP study results that show where the peer review process has declared this is clear evidence of EMFs being a carcinogen, and that\u2019s at exposure levels that are very comparable to the average cell phone user. Not only that but this is 2G, 3G technology, so if if Pavel you\u2019re right, and this early data on 4G signal, that\u2019s way more modulated pulse, and complex, if this is\u00a0right it means 4G is even more of a danger and of a carcinogen,<\/strong>\u00a0and with 5G, well in reality we don\u2019t know but\u00a0we can argue that it\u2019s probably not getting better at all<\/strong>\u00a0because the technology and the supercomputing allow us to create these modulation patterns that are way more complex, that we understand it and AI and everything is exponentially more complex, and this is what allows us to put so much data on the same signal, not have called drop offs, not have data packets loss, and in having this AG video stream so fast, and you have your neighbor in a crowd and they do the same, and the videos don\u2019t interfere with each other,\u00a0on an engineering standpoint that\u2019s amazing, but on<\/strong>\u00a0a biological standpoint it\u2019s an incredible jamming of your system.<\/strong><\/p>\n

54:23 NP<\/strong>:\u00a0I want to finish this discussion with the good news<\/strong>. Let\u2019s talk about how could we change technology, and how do you with all your expertise, do you think we could \u00a0start with this idea: do you think we could have a Wi-Fi signal that is like a PEMF [pulsed electro magnetic frequency] device that regenerates the human body? Is that an idea that\u2019s crazy or that could be almost not undetectable by the body?<\/p>\n

54:56 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0I would say we are not at that stage because we\u00a0do not know enough about all those natural signals<\/strong>\u00a0to be sure how to construct the devices that can help with that. What we can do, and this is a project I am working on to introduce a signal regenerator with the Schumann Resonance. So imagine that you shield your house from incoming radiation, and at the same time you have an antenna outside the house, which is taking the Schumann Resonance signal, very tiny, regenerates that so we now have to extract the signal from all that noise. It\u2019s very, very difficult. Our body is constantly trying to do this, and it\u2019s amazing but it\u2019s really amazing that it still somehow tunes to the Schumann Resonance in that noise because technically for example, I work in the military for electromagnetic protection of sensitive information, and I know that you can extract from noise, you can extract the signal if you know what the signal is, the certain characteristic of the signal, you can extract it even if the noise is 100 times higher than the signal.<\/p>\n

56:42 PW:<\/strong>\u00a0This is for example for the human voice. This is extraction from a very long distance using different techniques you can restore that signal. So I am trying to design a device that can extract the Schumann Resonance, and rebuild it with the natural power inside the shielded environment. This is one thing we can try to do. Probably if we know a lot about this Schumann Resonance signal, we can at least try to build the Wi-Fi signal around it. That\u2019s not that easy because the brainwave pattern is a fixed frequency. It changes, it regulates itself. It\u2019s a self-regulating system. You respond to the influences from the environment, to your psychological states, to a lot of things. So if we want to build a signal that is in tune with your particular situation I would say it\u2019s quite impossible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n