The Parkland, FL, school shooting was one more in a (seemingly endless) string of fabricated events that appear to be designed to instill fear into the public to make it more amenable to manipulation to promote a political agenda, which, as Dave Hodges of The Commonsense Show has observed, has three stages:
First, a massive assault on the 1st Amendment, covered by the use of private companies–namely, the Social Media Giants: Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter–to remove critics of “official accounts” from publicizing and sharing their research;
Second, a correlated attack on the 2nd Amendment, where the University of Hawaii’s Democide project has shown there were 19 genocides during the 20th Century, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation, leaving the population helpless to resist; and,
Third, the extraction of dissidents–the critics, those who speak out against “fake news”, propaganda and censorship–who must be removed because they pose a threat to the Deep State and can inspire others to stand up for their rights and transferred to American gulags, which we know as “FEMA camps”.
That the removal of guns from law-abiding citizens is not in the interest of the American people follows from studies that have shown that gun ownership and homicide rates are inversely related, which means the greater gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate, as multiple studies have shown. John Lott, The War on Guns (2016), makes a very good read about what’s really going on. Consider:
This means that we confront the choice between high gun ownership and low homicide rates or low gun ownership and high homicide rates. Why call the police in a threatening situation? Because they have guns. Egad! Are we incapable of learning from the Chicago experience, which has among the most stringent gun control laws in the country but also the highest gun violence and homicide rate?
Parkland is only the latest in a series of staged events, which are intended to undermine our rights under the 2nd Amendment, which were inspired by Barack Obama’s nullification of the Smith-Mundt Act, which precluded the use of the same techniques of disinformation and propagand within the United States as were being used without. For substantiation, here’s a review of the latest on Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Charlottesville, Las Vegas and Parkland, about which much more below:
(2) The timing was exquisite on multiple grounds, which were to benefit the Democratic Party:
(2a) Changing the narrative from the crumbling Russiagate
scam to gun control:
FL) from the Awan trial:
(9b) Student shot in the right leg turns out to be wearing a prosthesis with no toe nails:
(9c) Maddy Wilford, shot 3 times, has miraculously healed from her most serious wounds:
(9d) Samantha Fuentes covers wounds inflicted by an AR-15 a week earlier with band-aids:
(9e) Another student “in holocaust class” said she defected a bullet with a book, “a tiny book”:
(9f1) A teacher said she confronted the shooter, who shot and killed another across the hallway:
(9f2) But Alex Scott, a 25-year police officer and 15-year general detective isn’t buying her story:
(9g) The only “live” footage shows an apparent mannequin lying in a pool of fake blood:
(10) The father of student activist David Hogg turns out to be an FBI “Crisis Management Specialist”:
(10a) David was outed by a fellow student in an earlier exchange caught on tape:
(10b) Surprise! His father, Kevin, turns out to be an FBI “Crisis Management Specialist”:
WOW! What are we to conclude from the evidence? Using inference to the best explanation, I would suggest that the hypothesis,
(h1) Parkland was yet another staged shooting event,
is overwhelmingly better supported than its alternative,
(h2) Parkland was a real shooting where 17 died.
What, after all, is the probability of doctors and teachers lying, of multiple students faking wounds and of a deceased coach attending a funeral after his demise if it were a real shooting? Approximately zero. What is the probability of that same body of evidence if it were staged? Approximately one.
Here’s a comprehensive review of virtually every aspect of the Parkland shooting, including how they appear to have arranged to have a cooperative coroner in place, just as they have in Las Vegas. If we can’t see through these staged events, they are going to vitiate the 1st Amendment and take our guns. We will then be helpless to defend ourselves against the tyranny of the Deep State enveloping us. Who better to write the script than an FBI “Crisis Management Specialist”, the father, Kevin Hogg?
My inference is that this was done in collaboration with the local authorities, including the Broward County Sheriff, Scott Israel, where David Hogg was planted in the school to be a spokesman for gun control in accordance with the agenda of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who desperately need to change the narrative from the crumbling “Russiagate” story and FBI/DNC/DWS collusion to the more DNC-friendly gun control agenda, using students as stooges and unwitting DNC activists.
Yes, even the students, for the most part, have been played. They don’t know enough about the issue to have a rational opinion about gun control, especially when it turns out that rates of gun ownership and homicide are inversely related. We have another example of a popular, widespread belief–that the more guns, the more homicides–being exploited by a political party to advance its interests at the expense of the interests of the American people. Don’t be played! They are out to steal our country.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and co-editor of moonrockbooks.com.